Brief

On June 6, 2025, the Competition Bureau issued an update regarding Five contractors in Brandon, Manitoba, plead guilty to conspiracy related to social housing projects. The five individuals manipulated 54 contracts for a total value of approximately $3.5 million between 2011 and 2016, leading to fines totaling $196,000.

A Competition Bureau investigation revealed that the five individuals manipulated 54 contracts between 2011 and 2016
February 6, 2025 – GATINEAU (Québec), Competition Bureau
Yesterday, five contractors in Brandon, Manitoba, pleaded guilty before the Manitoba Court of King’s Bench for conspiring to divide up social housing refurbishment contracts among themselves. They each pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy under section 45 of the Competition Act. They were ordered to pay a combined amount of $196,000 in fines.
Between December 2011 and February 2016, the five conspiring contractors manipulated 54 social housing contracts awarded by the Manitoba Housing and Renewal Corporation, for a total value of approximately $3.5 million. Their scheme allowed them to determine in advance which one would obtain the public contract and to establish the price of the project funded by taxpayers. The Manitoba Court of King’s Bench sentenced them to pay the following fines:

Geoff Gregoire – $61,000
James Kauk – $53,000
Guy Pringle – $33,000
Doug Gunnarson – $25,000
Ryan Lamont – $24,000

An investigation by the Competition Bureau revealed the existence of this illegal agreement and led to criminal charges against the five individuals in December 2022.
Manipulating contracts to suppress competition is a serious crime, and it is even more concerning when it involves essential services and infrastructure projects for vulnerable populations, such as social housing. These schemes only ever benefit those who collude to increase their profits by driving up the price of public contracts to the detriment of all taxpayers. That is why cracking down on cartels is a top priority for the Competition Bureau, and we encourage anyone who suspects a business or individual of engaging in illegal agreements to report it through our Information Centre or online complaint form.

Highlights content goes here...

Purpose
The purpose of this update is to inform stakeholders about a significant outcome of an investigation conducted by the Competition Bureau, which revealed a conspiracy among five contractors in Brandon, Manitoba. The investigation found that these individuals manipulated social housing refurbishment contracts between 2011 and 2016, resulting in fines being imposed on them.

Effects on Industry
The effects on industry are substantial due to the nature of the crime committed by the conspiring contractors. By manipulating contracts to suppress competition, they were able to determine who would obtain public contracts and establish inflated prices for projects funded by taxpayers. This has significant implications for the social housing sector in Manitoba, as it undermines the integrity of the bidding process and increases costs for vulnerable populations.

Relevant Stakeholders
The relevant stakeholders affected by this update include:
– Social housing providers and recipients in Manitoba
– Local government agencies responsible for awarding contracts (Manitoba Housing and Renewal Corporation)
– Taxpayers who fund social housing projects through their taxes
– The Competition Bureau, which is tasked with enforcing competition laws and protecting consumers from anti-competitive practices

Next Steps
In response to this update, the following next steps are required:
– Individuals and businesses that suspect or have evidence of similar anti-competitive practices should report it to the Competition Bureau’s Information Centre or online complaint form.
– The Manitoba Housing and Renewal Corporation should review its contracting processes to ensure they are robust enough to prevent such manipulations in the future.

Any Other Relevant Information
This investigation highlights the importance of competition laws and their enforcement in protecting consumers from anti-competitive practices. It also underscores the commitment of the Competition Bureau to cracking down on cartels that engage in illegal agreements, especially when these affect essential services like social housing.

Competition Bureau

Quick Insight
RADA.AI
RADA.AI
Hello! I'm RADA.AI - Regulatory Analysis and Decision Assistance. Your Intelligent guide for compliance and decision-making. How can i assist you today?
Suggested

Form successfully submitted. One of our GRI rep will contact you shortly

Thanking You!

Enter your Email

Enter your registered username/email id.

Enter your Email

Enter your email id below to signup.

Enter your Email

Enter your email id below to signup.
Individual Plan
$125 / month OR $1250 / year
Features
Best for: Researchers, Legal professionals, Academics
Enterprise Plan
Contact for Pricing
Features
Best for: Law Firms, Corporations, Government Bodies