Brief

Here is a summary of the provided document:

Summary:

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has published the findings of its initial data exercise on bank account access and closures. The data collected from banks, building societies, and payment companies shows that no firm closed an account primarily due to a customer's political views between July 2022 and June 2023. However, the FCA will continue to verify the data and examine reasons for account closures, such as reputational risk, financial crime, and inactivity. The regulator plans to undertake further work, including follow-up data assurance, supervisory work, and research into reasons for unbanked individuals. The FCA also emphasizes the importance of digital identities in countering financial crime and aiding financial inclusion, and suggests that the government consider implementing measures to support the fight against fraud and enhance digital identities.

Source: Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) report on bank account access and closures.

The FCA has published the findings of its initial data exercise on bank account access and closures.

The information supplied by banks, building societies and payment companies suggests that no firm closed an account between July 2022 and June 2023 primarily because of a customer’s political views. The Payment Accounts Regulations ban banks or building societies discriminating on this basis.

The FCA will be doing further work with firms to verify the data and to better understand the reasons behind, for example, the closure of accounts due to reputational risk.

By far the most common reasons providers gave for closing, suspending or declining an account was because it was inactive/dormant or because there were concerns about financial crime.

The FCA’s report is the result of information gathered from firms at speed. The regulator has today set out what further work it will undertake to examine the information provided and address gaps in the data.

In its review, the FCA noted that unlike other jurisdictions there is no right to an account in the UK and some protections, for example the anti-discrimination measures in the Payment Accounts Regulations, do not apply to businesses, charities, political parties and civil society organisations.

Nikhil Rathi, FCA Chief Executive, commented:

‘While no bank, building society or payment firm reported to us that they had closed accounts primarily due to someone’s political views, further work is needed for us to be sure.

‘As we undertake that work, the time is also right for a debate on how we balance access to bank accounts with the threat of financial crime, as well as firms’ reasonable risk and commercial appetites. An important question for policy makers is whether all individuals, businesses and organisations should have the right to an account, as is the case in some other countries.

‘What’s more, international comparisons suggest robust digital identities could play an important role not only in countering financial crime but also in aiding financial inclusion.’

The FCA’s further work will include:

  • Further follow up to provide assurance of the accuracy of the data reported to us, concentrating particularly on outlier firms.
  • Additional supervisory work to be sure of firms’ conclusions on accounts closed for political reasons and closer analysis of accounts closed for reasons of reputational risk.
  • Further review of declined applications for and terminations of basic bank accounts.
  • Further research into the reasons why 1.1m people in the UK are unbanked and the characteristics of this population.
  • Engagement with consumer groups and organisations to understand their experiences and impact of account declines, terminations and suspensions where these are within our regulatory remit.
  • A financial inclusion sprint in Q1 2024 focussed on improving consumer access to financial services.

The FCA has also reiterated to firms their obligations under the Consumer Duty, and the need to ensure they are collecting accurate and sufficient information to fully assess whether they are delivering good outcomes for their customers. The FCA will take prompt action if significant issues at firms are identified.

The FCA has also indicated close working with Government on these issues and set out a number of areas Government may wish to consider, including:

  • greater checks by Companies House to support the fight against fraud
  • the development of a strategic approach to digital identity to aid financial inclusion and lessen financial crime risk
  • consideration, as part of the passage of the Online Safety Bill, of whether the cost of compensating for consumer losses due to fraud is being appropriately shared.

The FCA has also published an international perspective on account closures.

Notes to editors

  1. Report on UK Payment Accounts: access and closures.
  2. Read our data request – this included the number of accounts closed and suspended, applications denied, and the reasons why.
  3. FCA letter to Chancellor: Provision of Banking Services.
  4. International de-risking research note.
  5. Across personal and business accounts, there were 4 cases and an additional 4 complaints reported to us by the firms with ‘expression of political or any other opinions’ as the reason for the account closure or complaint. We followed up directly with firms on these cases and further information showed that the primary reason for action was not the ‘expression of political or any other opinions’. For the majority of cases it was, in fact, customer behaviour (e.g. racist language directed at staff).
  6. Find out more information about the FCA.

Highlights content goes here...

Summary

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has released the findings of its initial data exercise on bank account access and closures, which gathered information from banks, building societies, and payment companies between July 2022 and June 2023. The data collected does not indicate any cases where a bank or building society closed an account primarily due to a customer’s political views. The Payment Accounts Regulations prohibit discrimination based on political views.

The most common reasons provided by firms for closing, suspending, or declining accounts were inactivity or concerns about financial crime. The FCA will conduct further work to verify the data, examine reasons behind account closures, and address gaps in the data.

The regulator has set out its plans to undertake further work, including:

1. Verifying the accuracy of the data reported by firms, with a focus on outlier firms.
2. Conducting additional supervisory work to ensure firms’ conclusions on accounts closed for political reasons and closer analysis of accounts closed due to reputational risk.
3. Reviewing declined applications for and terminations of basic bank accounts.
4. Researching the reasons why 1.1 million individuals in the UK are unbanked and the characteristics of this population.
5. Engaging with consumer groups and organizations to understand their experiences and impact of account declines, terminations, and suspensions.
6. Launching a financial inclusion sprint in Q1 2024 to improve consumer access to financial services.
7. Working closely with the government on these issues, including considering measures to support the fight against fraud, develop a strategic approach to digital identity, and address the cost of compensating for consumer losses due to fraud.

The FCA has also emphasized the importance of its Consumer Duty, which requires firms to collect accurate and sufficient information to ensure they are delivering good outcomes for their customers. If significant issues at firms are identified, the FCA will take prompt action.

Financial Conduct Authority

Quick Insight
RADA.AI
RADA.AI
Hello! I'm RADA.AI - Regulatory Analysis and Decision Assistance. Your Intelligent guide for compliance and decision-making. How can i assist you today?
Suggested

Form successfully submitted. One of our GRI rep will contact you shortly

Thanking You!

Login

Enter your Email

Enter your email id below to signup.

Enter your Email

Enter your email id below to signup.
Individual Plan
$125 / month OR $1250 / year
Features
Best for: Researchers, Legal professionals, Academics
Enterprise Plan
Contact for Pricing
Features
Best for: Law Firms, Corporations, Government Bodies