Brief

Here is a summary of the provided document:

Summary:

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has joined the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) in filing an amicus brief in a court case to appeal a district court decision that did not comply with the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) requirements. The case involves a consumer who disputed information on her credit report, and the FTC and CFPB argue that the district court incorrectly interpreted the FCRA. The brief disputes that if a furnisher of credit information cannot verify whether disputed information is accurate, it must delete it from the data reported to credit reporting agencies. The FTC and CFPB argue that accurate information on a consumer report is essential, and the case could impact consumers' rights under the FCRA to dispute and have inaccurate information removed.

Enforcement

We enforce federal competition and consumer protection laws that prevent anticompetitive, deceptive, and unfair business practices.

View Enforcement

,

Search or browse
the Legal Library

Find legal resources and guidance to understand your business responsibilities and comply with the law.

Browse legal resources

,

Take action

,

Competition Matters

,

John Newman & Amy Ritchie, Bureau of Competition

,

,

Policy

We work to advance government policies that protect consumers and promote competition.

View Policy

,

Search or browse
the Legal Library

Find legal resources and guidance to understand your business responsibilities and comply with the law.

Browse legal resources

,

Take action

,

Technology Blog

,

Staff in the Bureau of Competition & Office of Technology

,

,

Advice and Guidance

Learn more about your rights as a consumer and how to spot and avoid scams. Find the resources you need to understand how consumer protection law impacts your business.

,

Take action

,

Consumer Advice

,

Business Guidance

,

Servicemembers:
Your tool for financial readiness

Visit militaryconsumer.gov

,

Get consumer protection basics, plain and simple

Visit consumer.gov

,

Learn how the FTC protects free enterprise and consumers

Visit Competition Counts

,

Looking for competition guidance?

Competition Guidance

,

News and Events

,

,


,

Sign up for the latest news

Follow us on social media

         

,

About the FTC

Our mission is protecting consumers and competition by preventing anticompetitive, deceptive, and unfair business practices through law enforcement, advocacy, and education without unduly burdening legitimate business activity.

Learn more about the FTC

,

Looking for legal documents or records? Search the Legal Library instead.

,

Looking for legal documents or records? Search the Legal Library instead.

,

For Release

,

,

The Federal Trade Commission has joined the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) in filing an amicus brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit urging reversal of a district court decision that the agencies say overlooked the Fair Credit Reporting Act’s requirement to delete information disputed by a consumer that cannot be verified by a furnisher of that information.

The case, Suluki v. Credit One Bank, NA, involves a consumer who allegedly disputed with the credit reporting agencies (CRAs) information on her credit report that she said resulted from multiple credit card accounts that her mother opened in her name without her permission or knowledge. The CRAs sent the dispute to the credit card companies for investigation. After Credit One refused to remove the information and purportedly verified the consumer as the accountholder, she sued the company under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which requires that, upon being notified of a dispute by a CRA, furnishers investigate whether the disputed information can be verified. If such an investigation is inconclusive, the FCRA requires the furnisher to delete from the data that the furnisher submits to CRAs the information that cannot be verified, according to the FTC-CFPB brief.

The consumer appealed after the district court granted Credit One’s request for summary judgment and held that she could not show harm from any failure by Credit One to conduct a reasonable investigation.

In their brief, the FTC and CFPB disputed the district court’s interpretation of the FCRA. They noted that under the FCRA, if a furnisher of credit information cannot determine whether the disputed consumer information is accurate, it must tell the CRAs that the information could not be verified and must delete it from the data that it reports to the CRAs.

Inaccurate information on a consumer report can hamper people’s ability to get housing, employment, and credit. The FTC and CFPB maintain that the lower court’s decision could impact consumers’ rights under the FCRA to dispute the completeness or accuracy of information and have it removed if a furnisher cannot verify that it is accurate.

The Commission voted 3-0 to join the CFPB amicus brief.

,

The Federal Trade Commission works to promote competition, and protect and educate consumers. You can learn more about consumer topics and report scams, fraud, and bad business practices online at ReportFraud.ftc.gov. Follow the FTC on social media, read our blogs and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

,

Office of Public Affairs

,

202-326-2924

Highlights content goes here...

Summary

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) have jointly filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, urging the reversal of a district court decision in the case Suluki v. Credit One Bank, NA. The case involves a consumer who disputed incorrect information on her credit report, which was allegedly the result of multiple credit card accounts opened in her name by her mother without her knowledge or permission.

The FTC and CFPB argued that the district court’s interpretation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) was incorrect, as it failed to require Credit One Bank to investigate the disputed information and delete it from the credit report if it could not be verified. The FCRA requires furnishers of credit information to conduct a reasonable investigation when notified of a dispute and delete any information that cannot be verified.

The FTC and CFPB maintain that accurate and complete information on a consumer’s credit report is crucial for their ability to access housing, employment, and credit. They argue that the lower court’s decision could impact consumers’ rights under the FCRA to dispute inaccurate information and have it removed.

The Commission voted 3-0 to join the CFPB amicus brief. The FTC’s mission is to protect consumers and promote competition by enforcing federal laws and educating the public. Consumers can report scams, fraud, and bad business practices online at ReportFraud.ftc.gov and follow the FTC on social media for the latest news and resources.

Federal Trade Commission

Quick Insight
RADA.AI
RADA.AI
Hello! I'm RADA.AI - Regulatory Analysis and Decision Assistance. Your Intelligent guide for compliance and decision-making. How can i assist you today?
Suggested

Form successfully submitted. One of our GRI rep will contact you shortly

Thanking You!

Enter your Email

Enter your registered username/email id.

Enter your Email

Enter your email id below to signup.

Enter your Email

Enter your email id below to signup.
Individual Plan
$125 / month OR $1250 / year
Features
Best for: Researchers, Legal professionals, Academics
Enterprise Plan
Contact for Pricing
Features
Best for: Law Firms, Corporations, Government Bodies